Keynote vs powerpoint1/8/2024 ![]() Identical Layout: I have a beamer theme that exactly resembles my Keynote template (or vice versa), so that content can (geometrically) easily be transferred between both.The point here is to get a workflow that makes it reasonably easy to switch between both: I personally use beamer for all my teaching and other stuff that calls for long-time maintenance, but tend to use Keynote or Powerpoint for smaller "one-shot" presentations, such as conference talks. I am sure there are many other ways to get around moving graphics between applications but these work for me. With Adobe Illustrator I am also able to extract postscript graphics out from (unlocked) pdfs which is very useful for teaching. As you implicitly state working with LaTeX prevents cut and paste but I note that you use Photoshop in which case it is easy to cut from other documents and save as. All in all I find working with these graphics formats very easy. Since I also work a lot with postscript output from for example Matlab, I convert the eps-output to pdf. ![]() Since it is non-destructive, it does not compress photographs well so I use jpeg compression for such illustrations. Png is great for line graphics which it compresses very well. From a different angle, beamer forces you to think things through in advance.įor my graphics I use. The fact that this happens less and less is probably because with time I grow more comfortable with Beamer. The only time I might resort to Powerpoint is if I am hard pressed for time since it is easier to make corrections last minute. Positioning text, boxes, and arrows often have to be handled on a case-by-case basis whereas you can get a sense of general positioning for slide layouts after a few times, and the latter is therefore more amenable to solving with macros.Įdit: I had thought the LibreOffice presentation software was called "Presentation" but it is "Impress". I understand the tikz package is a very powerful tool that permits annotation, but for this part I think a WYSIWYG tool might be more convenient as as each figure/image is unique and a little more complicated than slide layouts. A lot of the arguments "for" Beamer is the pdf format, but I often print my Powerpoint/Impress slides to pdf anyway so that's a moot point for me. So this is one less hassle, unless the picture is in gif format, but I would say those cases arise less often. Update: Thanks for bringing to my attention that jpegs are accepted by pdflatex. Is it better to saveīack to a png and let Beamer do the conversion? when annotating, I often "place" the image inĪdobe Photoshop, draw over it, and save as pdf.(is it inefficient)? Since the page size of Beamer pages are much smaller, does that generally make raster images less readable? how well Beamer handles images(pngs) in comparison to Powerpoint/Impress.Have you deliberated such a decision and what has been your experience? Can you also comment on However, I'm more comfortable with Beamer because I don't have to rely on my unreliable hand-eye coordination to place and align figures, and you know which figures on the hard drive are included in the presentation because of the explicit \includegraphics command (as opposed to importing figures from the menu bar in Powerpoint/Presentation). ![]() With Beamer, you additionally have to convert jpegs to pngs for pdflatex) and bring in an external tool (e.g., Adobe Photoshop) for annotation. I see advantages for using Powerpoint/Impress for slides heavy in images/figures: you can often copy figures in OSX Preview and paste into Powerpoint/Impress without having to explicitly screen capture, and download figures as Powerpoint slides from online journals. Some amount of equations but probably less (by slide count) than the images. I am preparing a seminar course and will be showing a lot of figures: photos, screen captures of journal figures, etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |